Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1159320120140030173
Korean Journal of Vision Science
2012 Volume.14 No. 3 p.173 ~ p.179
Comparison of Prescription Value for Monocular and Binocular Refraction
Jeong Youn-Hong

Abstract
Purpose : To get a effective clinical data about refractive error we compared the monocular refraction with the binocular refraction on 47 myopic students aged between 18 and 26 years.

Method : The college students without abnormal binocular function were tested on the dominant eye test, accommodation lag, monocular refraction and binocular refraction with HIC test.

Results : There was statistical differences in accommodative lags between dominant(0.58¡¾0.67D) and non-dominant eye(0.70¡¾0.62D)(p=0.043). The mean value of the binocular refraction using HIC method is less as dominant(-0.24¡¾0.29D) and non-dominant eye(-0.26¡¾0.28D) than the one of the monocular refraction.

Conclusions : This results indicates that the prescription on dominant and non-dominant eyes should be cautious based on the refraction and binocular function tests.
KEYWORD
Dominant eye, Monocular refraction, Accommodation Lag, Binocular refraction, Humphriss immediate contrast test
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)